photoblog and general thoughts
30
Mar

Stop 43…

The UK Digital Economy Bill is being pushed though the Commons nice and fast so there isn’t any time to have a proper debate about it before the election, so Clause 43 may soon become law. The deadline to write to your MP (I’ve just done it) is the 6th April.

From stop43.org

Until now, if someone found one of your photographs and wanted to use it commercially, they couldn’t without first asking you. Clause 43 changes all that by allowing the use of “Orphan Works” – photographs, illustrations and other artworks whose owners cannot be found.

Clause 43 says that if someone finds your photograph, wants to use it and decides that they can’t trace you, they can do whatever they like with it after paying an arbitrary fee to a UK Government-appointed “licensing body”. You’ll never know unless you happen to find it being used in this way, in which case you should be able to claim some money.

There’s more. Clause 43 also introduces “Extended Collective Licensing”.

This means that if someone finds your photograph and can trace you, they still don’t have to contact you for permission to use it. They can go to a UK Government-appointed “collecting society” and ask them instead. They’ll pay an arbitrary fee and be able to do whatever they like with the photograph. Your photograph. Again, without asking you first or paying what you would have charged.

More info from the AoP…

http://hub.the-aop.org/News_archive/p2_articleid/175

slogan

01
May

On the ball

Yeah, I’m Mr Current Affairs, I’ve only just found this arcticle from March, showing that something is being done about the police unlawfully stopping people photographing in public. MP Austin Mitchell has tabled an Early Day Motion (EDM) in the House of Commons condemning police action against lawful photography in public places. – full story on Amateur Photographer site. (where I also got the sentance above :-)

18
Apr

Tourist, not Terrorist

Another article highlighting the problem that some photographers have by the police and security firms confusing them with terrorists while they are taking photos. Shows examples of
photographers being stopped for taking photos of people and buildings in public places, which is actually 100% legal. But no one seems to have told the police, the ever gallant upholders of the law this. Ah well.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7351252.stm
Also, as part of Londons security campaign, now anyone with a camera is a suspect, which means any potential terrorist now knows not to use a camera… good thinking.